Monday, January 3, 2011

Remembering the Black Panther Party, This Time with Women



Remembering the Black Panther Party, This Time with Women
by Jennifer Williams|Ms. Blog

“What we remember about the [Black Panther Party] is sort of like ‘sexy black men with guns,’” Tanya Hamilton (left), writer and director of the Indie Spirit Award-nominated new film Night Catches Us, told Fresh Air’s Terry Gross in a recent interview.

Few people know about women’s leadership in the Party’s education and free breakfast programs for children. Even fewer are aware that Elaine Brown chaired the party for three years in Huey Newton’s absence and used her authority to place other women in leadership positions and to combat the sexist behavior of male party members.

Hamilton had those women in mind when she created Patricia “Patti” Wilson (Kerry Washington), the female lead of her debut film Night Catches Us. Set in 1976 Philadelphia, the film witnesses the ruins of a movement. Ex-Panther Patti, an attorney, is raising a precocious daughter, Iris (Jamara Griffin), on her own after her husband’s murder by the Philadelphia police. She refuses to talk about the painful past but still lives in the house where her husband was shot.

Hamilton considers Patti “the most complicated character” in the predominantly male-cast film. “A lot of the women I think were kind of the backbone [of the movement],” she said in an interview with Michel Martin. Patti remains the backbone of her community by bailing young men out of jail and raising money for their defense. When former Panther Marcus (Anthony Mackie) returns to Philly after a mysterious four-year absence, Patti is the only one who believes he’s not a snitch.

Read the Full Essay @ Ms. Blog

***

Jennifer Williams is a writer and professor of English at New York University. She blogs at for colored girls who drink cosmos when suicide seems to gauche.

Will the Revolution Be Televised on OWN?



In a perfect world, OWN might have been conceived as a counter network to BET, TV-One and Centric.

Will the Oprah Winfrey Network Appeal to Black Audiences?
by Mark Anthony Neal | TheLoop21

In a recent New York Observer article about the net worth of Shawn Carter, Columbia University Scholar Manning Marable, author of the classic How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black America, cautioned that great investments were not “a strategy for a black capitalism. There the question is how to develop strategies that maximize the growth of capital and ownership within the black community.” For Marable wealth means nothing beyond personal achievement if not connected to ownership.

With an estimated net-worth of $2.7 Billion, according to Forbes Magazine, Oprah Winfrey has been one of the most recognizable and profitable brands in the world, largely via her signature product The Oprah Winfrey Show and her production company HARPO. With the debut of her new cable network—named OWN (the Oprah Winfrey Network)—Winfrey attempts to translate her brand into literal ownership of a network.

Read the Full Essay @ theLoop21.com

Did He just Say ‘Nigger’?: Policing My Son’s Educational TV


special to NewBlackMan

Did He just Say ‘Nigger’?: Policing My Son’s Educational TV
by Stephane Dunn

After my son’s teething had resulted in yet another long night, we sat down for a late morning breakfast. When my son waved a usual favorite away – oatmeal and applesauce – I knew I needed some safe distraction help; I didn’t have any dance or inspired performances of “Itsy Bitsy Spider” left in me after the sleepless night, so I turned on the television and settled on one of his favorite channels, Sprout.

As he listened intently to everything from the ‘Your Baby Can Read’ commercial to the Sunny Side Up show up, I concentrated on stealthily smuggling spoonfuls of oatmeal into his mouth. The programming continued until a new addition to the channel “What’s Your News” came on. It was our first preview of the show. Two young boys, one holding a moose puppet and the other a snake puppet, entertained a girl named Claire, who sat on a couch with a broken leg. From behind another sofa, the boys had the puppets engage in battle with each other. It was merely background chatter to my son’s father and I until suddenly, one of the puppets, the moose it appeared, warned the snake, “This is your last chance . . . nigger.”

My son’s father and I jumped up and looked at each other, questioning if we’d heard right. Due to the miracle of modern technology we paused and hit rewind ten more times, each of us trying hard to come up with other words that it could be. Never, my son’s father suggested hopefully. Not even close. It sounded like that same familiar big bad word. I got hotter and hotter, hearing it and worrying when my son seemed to be trying to mimic the puppet as he raced around us trying to figure out why Mommy and Daddy kept crowding around the TV. I had just enough calm to hit pause, record the audio of the scene, and email it to myself. We still hoped and cautioned ourselves about jumping the gun. Maybe what we halfway jokingly had nicknamed our black radar (antenna for racism) was so sharp, we were overly primed to hear the word. Besides, we also cautioned, you know how children’s enunciation can often be unclear. After hitting the computer rewind and replay tabs more than a dozen times, there was no mistaking what it still came out sounding like. Surely, it wasn’t supposed to have come through as that but it was coming out like the infamous N-word out of the mouth of a young boy in moose puppet disguise.

Children’s television channels have helped to ease ours and other parents’ concerns about our young children watching television and getting infused with inappropriate material. As much as I have longed for my late morning CNN fix or occasional lazy, pajama day indulging in flipping back and forth endlessly between grown folks' channels to my heart’s content, I have been especially grateful for PBS Kids and Sprout. Between such shows as Super Why, Sid the Science Kid, and of course Elmo and Sesame Street, we’ve applauded a lot of culturally savvy moves – Sesame Street’s recent cool nod to little black girls’ hair, for example, and the bilingual and cultural diversity emphasis infused throughout the programming of channels such as Sprout and PBS Kids.

We couldn’t DVR record the sequence after viewing so we have only this disturbing audio clip which opens the door to negating the seeming slip on the part of an esteemed kids’ network. The initial quick email response I received from Jenni Glenn, Sprout’s VP of Communications & Marketing on Sunday, declares that the matter has been “escalated . . . to the highest levels at Sprout’ and that they are “working diligently and quickly to identify and resolve this issue.” A day later, Sprout offered its final email response: “it is . . . impossible that such repellant and offensive language would get past all the experienced professionals who watch the footage and listen to the sound for each and every episode” and further that the word said was “Never.” We have no doubt that such a slip is rare and should always be impossible but don’t believe that was the case in this instance. The email also explained that the episode has been edited so as not to leave the possibility for ‘misinterpretation’ open.

We aren’t interested in a ‘we say it did, they said it didn’t’ debate with the channel. More important is the fact that on the first Sunday of the New Year we got a much needed reminder: we can’t afford to stop listening or watching carefully to those babbling puppets and learning sequences that are the hallmark of educational television for young children. We can’t let it merely fade into background noise amid the too much to do at once busyness that most of us parents have to contend with as we try to vigilantly raise and nurture our little ones. Sprout and its prestigious co-owners (Comcast, Sesame Workshop, HIT Entertainment & PBS) can’t be left to make sure our child is only exposed to appropriate, educational material via television.

We have renewed our resolve to be continuously responsible too, listening and watching no matter what other crucial task is on hand. In his seventeen month, my son’s learning lesson for the second day of 2011 was a little bit about uttering inappropriate words like nigger.

***

Stephane Dunn, Ph.D., a writer and assistant professor at Morehouse College, specializes in film, popular culture, and African American Studies, and creative writing. She is the author of Baad Bitches and Sassy Supermamas: Black Power Action Films (University of Illinois Press 2008) and her work has appeared in such publications as Ms., TheRoot, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and Best African American Essays. She can be reached at stephane@theloop21.com

Billy Preston: "My Sweet Lord"



Best known by George Harrison's version, "My Sweet Lord" was initially recorded by Billy Preston. Harrison who wrote the song, said that he was inspired to write it after hearing "Oh Happy Day" by the Edwin Hawkins Singers.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

The Believer -- Interview with Pharoahe Monch



The Believer -- Interview with Pharoahe Monch
by Adam Mansbach

“zadu za! zuh za! zu baby!”
Good things for a song to include:
Goals
Morals
Quadruple metaphors

Even in the thick of the bountiful early ’90s scene, the Queens-bred duo known as Organized Konfusion stood out. On their self-titled debut and their revered follow-up, 1994’s Stress: The Extinction Agenda, Pharoahe Monch and his partner, Prince Poetry, defined the lyrical vanguard with ear-bending enjambment, melodic cadences, stutter-stepping flows, and furious, multisyllabic rhyme flurries. Perhaps more than any of their contemporaries’, OK’s records conveyed an exhilarating sense of possibility: like the avatars of free jazz, they had the chops and the courage to take a song anywhere, at any time.

Conceptually, the group was just as adventurous, rhyming from the perspectives of stray bullets and “hypnotical” gases. The way they cloaked battle rhymes and social commentary in clouds of energetic abstraction marked them as heirs to legendary Bronx super-weirdos the Ultramagnetic MC’s—as well as forefathers to scores of unlistenable rappers who never mastered the proper ratio of organization to confusion.

Critical acclaim and $4.25 will buy you an iced mocha latte, so after a third album, 1997’s The Equinox, Monch decided to go it alone. The year 1999 saw the much-anticipated release of Internal Affairs on the tastemaking Rawkus Records. Like the disc with which it shared advertising space, Mos Def’s Black on Both Sides, Internal Affairs showcased the versatility of a newly solo artist with ambitions and influences that both transcended and embodied hip-hop. Monch crooned, sparred with a who’s-who of guest MCs, and spewed high-concept rhymefests in the OK vein.

But it was “Simon Says,” Monch’s attempt to simplify his flow for maximum commercial impact, that gave the MC’s MC a bona fide crossover hit. Over an ominous sample jacked from a Godzilla movie, it commanded dancers to “get the fuck up,” and they obeyed in droves. Club DJs loved the song; radio embraced it. Charlie’s Angels and Boiler Room picked it up for their sound tracks. Then the Tokyo-smashing monster (or his human representatives) sued for the uncleared sample, and Rawkus was forced to pull the album from stores.

It would be nearly eight years before Monch released his next long-player, Desire, in June 2007—two or three eternities in the notoriously fast-moving world of hip-hop. Few artists could have marshaled a fan base after such lag-time, but hip-hoppers of a certain era are proving to be quite elephantine in the memory department (see: the resurrected career of MF Doom), and Desire found an audience.

It didn’t hurt that the album showcased Monch at the height of his powers: pushing boundaries with conspiracy theories, multipart narratives, and Tom Jones impressions; challenging listeners to digest his wordplay at the rate he served it up (“still get it poppin’ without Artist and Repertoire / ’cause Monch is a monarch, only minus the A & R”); structuring entire verses around the names of financial institutions and wireless devices. Desire manages to be simultaneously indignant and inspiring, defiant and joyful, hilarious and paranoid. Listening to it now, it is striking to realize how palpably the record feels like a document of the late Bush years.

Monch and I spoke several times by telephone shortly after his return to New York from a European tour. He was preparing for an Organized Konfusion reunion show, the first in ten years, and also laying verses for a new album, W.A.R. (We Are Renegades), scheduled for release in February. In each case, we talked until his cell phone ran out of juice.

—Adam Mansbach
I. THIS IS LADIES NIGHT!

THE BELIEVER: It seems to me that hip-hop today is like jazz was in the early ’70s. For the first time, the major innovators are not new artists, but fifteen- or twenty-year veterans—guys like you, MF Doom, Ghostface, Nas, Jay-Z. Even Lil Wayne has been in it for almost that long.

PHAROAHE MONCH: I think there’s a couple of reasons. Having the savvy to know what you want to say, how you want to say it, and what music you want to say it over comes with time spent and wisdom gained in a music career. Back in the days, a prodigy usually was cultivated by the veterans around him—take Nas, who was surrounded by Q-Tip, Pete Rock, Large Professor, Premier, and L.E.S., all listening to the tone of his voice and the way he rhymes melodically and saying, “He’s gonna sound better over this.” If Nas had tried to produce his first album himself and hand out demos to people… whatever, I don’t need to elaborate. I remember talking to Nas after [his debut verse on Main Source’s] “Live at the Barbeque,” and he was unsure what he wanted to do. It took time for him to cultivate his mental state and decide, This is what type of artist I want to be.

These days, you don’t get development. When new artists come out and they’re not being cosigned or some company doesn’t have a stake in it, or someone’s not getting paid under the table to produce the whole record or bring it to video, the artist really suffers. You’ve rarely got an artist that’s not being chauffeured into the business by some huge-ass names. Before, it could be like, “Who the fuck are these cats Ultramagnetic MC’s?” “Oh, they’re from the Bronx and they’re insane and this is what it sounds like and this is what they’re bringing to the table.” Now, unless somebody who’s already eleven thousand times platinum is like, “We’re ushering this project in,” it’s not really gonna pop commercially.

People gravitated to the first Organized Konfusion record because it sounded so experimental. We were trying to work on something more cultivated, nurtured by Paul C., a veteran producer who would have given us a more polished, tighter groove. Then Paul was murdered, so me and Prince Poetry was winging it—taking records to the studio and trying to do the shit ourselves.

BLVR: That reminds me of something Adam Bradley says in Book of Rhymes: that MCs who rhyme familiar, standard words tend to rhyme about familiar, standard subjects. So breaking out content-wise is dependent on breaking out poetically. It sounds like breaking out musically freed you to write differently, too.

PM: I would have to agree. I think it’s one of the major reasons that the art form is suffering and we’ve hit a wall artistically. A lot of the intricate parts of hip-hop culture became non-useful to the commercial mainstream, so they made it unusable. Like the beatbox: it goes from “All right, we don’t have money for equipment, but we’ve got this dude.…” to “We’ve got the budget to make a record now; we don’t need you in the group anymore.”

There’s a lot of pressure from the industry and the radio. Especially in New York, cats are like, “I guess this is what you have to do to be recognizable or even make this a profession at all. And I definitely could do what I’m hearing on the radio.” And they get caught in a rut. But the consumer is like, “I’m not gonna buy some Jay-Z-sounding shit from somebody other than him, because I can just wait for the best person to do it.”

BLVR: Have you seen the Byron Hurt documentary Hip-Hop: Beyond Beats and Rhymes, where he asks all these MCs standing on the street outside a record company why they all rhyme about the same shit, and they tell him it’s the only way to get signed?

PM: No, but I can imagine. A colleague of mine played me some stuff from a guy who gave him a CD and was like, “This is my group. And this is what we do.” And that shit was cool; it was cash and rims and coke. But then the same guy was like, “Here’s the CD of what I actually do outside of them, because I’m on my own shit.” And we were fucking blown the fuck away. You feel pressured to do what you think the public wants, when in actuality the sales aren’t reflecting what the radio is doing. Not in the least bit! At some point, there’s a disconnect. Five years ago, I was like, “I know this song is platinum: this is the four-hundredth time I’ve heard it this morning.” And then you check and not even the younger kids are buying into the shit. They’re like, “This is cool for my fucking cell phone alert, but I don’t believe this guy, he’s a clown.”

There are situations where I’m uncomfortable saying, “I’m a hip-hop artist.” In some circles, the response is like, “Oh, OK, so… you have whores and your ties are shiny?”

BLVR: Do you see a generation gap within hip-hop? Between the veteran artists and fans who connect hip-hop to social protest, and younger ones who just see hip-hop as a facet of pop culture? I’m thinking of the cover version of Public Enemy’s “Welcome to the Terrordome” on Desire, which is a brilliant way of knitting two generations together: commenting on the continuing relevance of that song, but also reinventing it.

PM: That’s exactly why I did it. I’m a big PE fan, very inspired by Chuck and the group. I laid the first verse, and I was playing it for people younger than me and they were like, “This shit is incredible. This is dope, this is relevant.” And I was like, “If you think this is crazy, you need to hear the original version,” and they were like, “What… original…?” And I was like, “Oh my god, that’s even more reason for me to do it.”

BLVR: They’re certainly never going to hear PE on the radio.

PM: Radio goes after this demographic of eight-to-eighteen-year-olds, and plays music they think facilitates that demographic, and really dumbs it down. But at the same time, my manager has a nephew in high school, and he’s telling me about the resurgence of golden-era shit in his high school. The same monster that they invented—the Internet, which is a gift and a curse, because it gives you all this access—allows kids to find Public Enemy and breeze through the shit, if they’re willing to become privy to it, and listen to “They Reminisce Over You” and fucking Large Professor and Illmatic.

When you find that music, you really feel in your soul what’s on the level with what. A producer friend of mine went to a conference in Phoenix, and all the bigwigs is on the panel, and the audience is fifteen-to-twenty-four-year-old up-and-coming producers, and a guy raises his hand and is like, “What’s going on with the music? I’m not really feeling what’s going on.” And a guy on the panel is like, “Well, you know, the Pro Tools and the Reason and the digital transfer…” and the kid is like, “Yo, forget all of that! I’m saying that I’m not feeling what cats are doing right now, what’s being served to us!” And people started clapping. You can’t fool all the people all the time.

BLVR: It’s great that that happened at a producers’ conference, in a room full of people who aspire to shape what’s going to be on the radio next year.

PM: Even at my old-ass age, I think back to my father and my older brother telling me, “This is not good.” I remember one time I bought Kool & The Gang’s Ladies Night and my brother broke the record and was like, “This is bullshit Kool & The Gang! This is not real Kool & The Gang!” And I was like, “What the fuck, man? This is Ladies Night!” It’s the same thing. There needs to be someone who can lead you in the right direction. There’s a need for pop. There’s a need for radio. There’s also a need to understand the brilliance and the depth of jazz and soul—and what hip-hop can be at its most brilliant and what hip-hop can be at its most simplistic.

Kids don’t even realize what they’re up against. If you idolize Kanye, know who Kanye’s influences are, and study that stuff. You’ll never match Kanye by starting off with his last record. You gotta go back and see that he was a great student of Jay-Z and a great student of Mos and a great student of Common and a great student of [Talib] Kweli. You just can’t jump in it and expect to be at that level.

Even the guys who I like who are coming up now, like this kid Blu from L.A., you talk to these dudes and they’re like, “My father was this,” “I listened to that,” “I was in the basement with this.” Radio makes it appear like you can get some sounds in a laptop and be the next dude. Those careers don’t really last, that’s the sad thing about it.

BLVR: Well, they used to be built on a lot more. Hip-hop was passed down through mentor-apprentice relationships, and a lot of the skills had to be learned firsthand. You weren’t going to figure out how to DJ or write graffiti unless somebody showed you. So you were responsible to your elders.…

PM: It’s crazy. I was watching an interview about the black man who performed the first open-heart surgery. Forty years later, you have surgeries removing bullets from people’s lungs. You don’t have the doctors saying, “Oh, fuck that heart surgery he did back in the day, I’m pulling bullets out of people’s lungs now,” right?

It mattered. It mattered what someone did to allow you to have the forum to do what you’re doing. There’s no way that you can say, “Fuck KRS-One. What I’m doing now is what I’m doing now is what I’m doing now.” And somebody has to pull cats aside, not for them to pay homage, you don’t need to pay homage, but to just try to understand the vehicle that’s allotted to you, why it’s there. There once was no radio for hip-hop. There once was no video shows for hip-hop. It’s like a man going, “This shit is all me, it has nothing to do with the universe, nothing to do with God, my parents….” You have to understand the vehicle, the form that allows you to do what you do, and why that is.

Read the Full Interview @ The Believer

Nichelle Nichols (Lt. Uhuru) - On Blaxploitation and Breaking Barriers



From the Reelblack vault comes this exclusive clip of actress/singer/author NICHELLE NICHOLS from the press room at the 2008 EAST COAST BLACK AGE OF COMICS CONVENTION in Philadelphia, PA. Journalist RAYMOND TYLER asks Ms. Nichols about working in film during the Blaxploitation era and the role her character LT. UHURA played in advancing the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.

Special Thanks: Raymond Tyler.

Is Medgar Evers College Under Attack? Faculty Battle Provost and President



Interview:
Is Medgar Evers College Under Attack? Faculty Battle Provost and President
by Eisa Nefertari Ulen

Turmoil rages at Central Brooklyn's historically Black institution of higher learning. Medgar Evers College, part of the CUNY public university system, is experiencing a public battle. Faculty have issued a resolution condemning the school's president and provost.

Several full time Medgar Evers College faculty and staff members who are part of the coalition that has been formed and who wish to remain anonymous responded to the following questions:

*****

1. Please explain what exactly has been going on at Medgar Evers College over the past several weeks. What prompted a group of full-time tenured faculty to issue a Resolution on President's and Provost's Leadership & Management?

President Pollard and Provost Johnson came to Medgar Evers in August 2009. Since that time, a number of issues arose which prompted faculty to be concerned about the competence, leadership and academic integrity of the President, Provost and his administration.

The final actions that prompted faculty to issue a Vote of No Confidence in the Offices of the President and Provost and in the leadership of the administration were the result of faculty learning about a number of irregularities in the procedures for the reappointment and non reappointment of faculty, the unprofessional behavior of the administration in disseminating letters of non reappointment to faculty (letters disseminated in classrooms), the cut back in services and resources for instructional support and the pending eviction of The Center for NuLeadership on Urban Solutions.

The following represents a list of concerns leading to the Faculty Vote of No Confidence.

• Faculty are concerned about the administration’s lack of respect for shared governance.

• Upon arriving at the College, the President authorized a CUNY group to conduct an assessment of the college. The assessment was primarily conducted with administrators, center directors and some chairs. This assessment was never concerned with the college community but decisions affecting the college have been made as a result of this assessment.

• The administration has neither a Strategic nor Master Plan after one year. As a result, there has been no movement with academic programs and the administration's inabilty to hold college council meetings has prevented academic programs, policies and curriculum issues from moving forward.

• Faculty feel disrespected and “bullied” by the Provost’s management style and professional demeanor in meetings.

• The Provost has refused to sign off on grants related to student and faculty research because he does not want to approve reassigned time that would allow faculty to work on grants and be released from teaching.

• The Provost initially told faculty who were scheduled to move in the new Science, Health and Technology building that unless they were actively involved in research, they would not be allowed to move into the new building. Faculty met with the Dean and Provost and came together to resist this. The Provost eventually relented and agreed to let all faculty move into the new building.

• The Provost eliminated the role of pre-professional advisor for pre med students and biology majors. This position had been at the college since 1975 and when this was made clear, the Provost insisted that there was no

• The Provost removed the Chair from the Department of Economics in the Spring 2010 semester and in August 2010, removed the Chair of the Education Department. Both of these Chairs had been elected by the faculty in their departments as required by the PSC CUNY contracts. These issues are in litigation.

• The search for the Provost lacked transparency and did not represent shared governance and practice. Faculty expressed their concern to the President and requested a new search. Additionally elected officials requested from CUNY that the formal appointment of the Provost be tabled or delayed because there were a number of concerns related to the Provost’s leadership and relationship with faculty. These requests were ignored and the President and Chancellor expressed unequivocal support for the Provost.

• In previous university settings, the Provost was accused of plagiarism and mishandling of the tenure and reappointment process for faculty.

• The President speaks of a student-centered campus. Medgar Evers College has always been a student-centered campus and students have praised the quality of student/faculty relations. However, the current administration has reduced resources for The Learning Center, Computer Labs, Library and Psych labs.

• The Provost eliminated the Writing Center and the Center for Teaching and Learning.

• The Administration changed the venue for commencement (which has traditionally been held on the college campus) without input from faculty and students. They relented after external sources, CUNY and elected officials intervened.

• The President hired top level administrators and consultants in the midst of a budget crisis. In previous administration at the University of the District of Columbia, the President was accused of mishandling the budget of the university and wasting millions of tax levy dollars.

• The Administration cancelled the Jazzy Jazz series and only brought it back (on a much smaller scale) after community outrage.

• The Administration removed Carver Bank ATMs and replaced them with Citibank ATMs. Upon learning of community outrage, the administration stated that they would look into bringing them back. To this date, the Carver ATMs have not been brought back to the campus.

• The Administration issued an eviction notice for The Center for NuLeadership and although the proposal for formal approval of the Center under CUNY guidelines was approved before the current administration came into existence, the President and Provost have refused to forward the proposal to CUNY.

• The current administration has not been able to get a quorum for college council meetings, the governing body of the college. There were only three meetings in the last year and only one legitimate meeting in the Fall 2010. As a result, issues related to curriculum and policy have not been addressed.

Read the Full Article @ EisaUlen.com